Colorado Probate Blog - Wade Ash Woods Hill & Farley, P.C.

Minority Interest Discounts in Family Controlled Entities

On August 2, 2016, the Treasury Department proposed a series of regulations to Section 2704 of the Internal Revenue Code. If these proposed regulations are made final, this could greatly limit the ability of family controlled partnerships, limited liability companies, and corporations to transfer interests in a manner that takes advantage of minority discounts.

Continue reading
  2201 Hits
2201 Hits

Estate of Petteys v. Farmers State Bank of Brush, 2016 COA 34, No. 14CA1581

On March 10, 2016, the Colorado Court of Appeals issued an opinion that reversed the trial court and held that an irrevocable trust, a part of which was included in the gross estate of the decedent, was required to contribute its pro rata share of estate taxes under Colorado's estate tax apportionment statute. Our firm had prepared the Will for the decedent, in which estate taxes attributable to the irrevocable trust's inclusion in his gross estate were specifically apportioned to that trust. The trust had been created in 1958. The decedent died in 2009; a U.S. Estate Tax Return was filed in 2010, the estate paid the entire tax due, and the personal representative requested that the trust contribute its share of the tax. When the trustee refused, the personal representative brought suit. Initially, the trial court held that because federal law was silent as to apportionment to such interests prior to the 1986 effective date for IRC 2207B, the Colorado statute at 15-12-916 applied, but the court did not decide certain other issues. After the IRS completed its audit in October 2012, final request for contribution was made. A hearing was held before the trial court in 2015 on the remaining issues, and the court ordered, among other things, that the effective date statute at 15-17-101 permitted the court to refuse to apply the Colorado Probate Code if it found it to be "inequitable." The trial court found that it would be inequitable to force the trustee to pay its pro rata share of the tax and entered judgment for the trustee. The personal representative appealed.

Continue reading
  1128 Hits
1128 Hits

Health Insurance Subsidies Confirmed to be Available to Taxpayers in all States

On June 25, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States held in the King v. Burwell decision that tax credits for health insurance premiums are available to taxpayers in every state, regardless of whether those taxpayers live in a state which has established its own health insurance exchange or a state which instead uses a federally-established exchange.  Chief Justice Roberts delivered the 6-3 decision.

Continue reading
  1302 Hits
1302 Hits

Perils of Avoiding Probate

By James R. Wade, Esq.

Continue reading
  1426 Hits
1426 Hits